![]() And that technique works brilliantly in the scope of this film. Audiences will understand who Steve Jobs, the man, was through the film even though they may not totally understand his full life history. However, the content of those conversations is true.Īnd with that, it is very interesting as to what makes a biopic a biopic. Again, I am very confident that the people who watch movies are at least as smart as the people who make movies, and I am certain that the audience is not going to believe that, in reality, Steve had these confrontations before the product launches. I think your concern is that it’s unfair to Steve Jobs, to the people who love Steve Jobs, to the legacy of Steve Jobs, to play with facts. In an interview with Den of Geek, Sorkin stated: But dramatizing real life isn’t always what’s best for the film medium, and a skill that Sorkin luckily possesses is taking truth and manipulating it only to the point of practical effectiveness, instead of just making things blatantly false. Well, for one thing, it’s impossible to know everything that the man said or how he acted in secret moments of his personal life, but then again why does that matter so much, and why does every biopic that comes out feel the need to utilize that? There is a time and a place for that traditional style, but how Sorkin wrote it is something entirely new. As mentioned earlier, Sorkin openly admitted that not everything Jobs says and does in the film is completely true. ![]() I got this idea, and I wrote an email to Scott saying, “If I had no one to answer to, I would write this entire movie in three real-time scenes, and each one would take place backstage before a particular product launch.Īnd that’s not all. In an interview with Wired, Sorkin expressed how he created the idea for the film and his quick pitch his The Social Network producer Scott Rudin: The structure of Steve Jobs is a major breakthrough for the genre because even if it doesn’t present what the individual has done over thirty years but just how they lived and grew in a few important moments can really give a better look into who they were. Other biopics like the recent Trumbo and Black Mass also used that structure similarly, but this one is showing the minute moments of Jobs’ life, not giving audiences the big, gigantic lifespan of the individuals that tend to grow tiring and often leave little knowledge-learned by the end credits. All of which is just showing a certain section of a life. It starts in 1984 with the launch of the first Macintosh, picks up again in 1988 with the doomed NeXT model, then starts again in 1998 with the arrival of iMac. He tells the story of Jobs in showing the behind-the-scenes discussions, arguments, and breakthroughs before three of Apple’s biggest product launches rather than just showing the typical childhood, adulthood, and death style that most biopics over the years have used. And even though the three-part style doesn’t seem original, it is in how Sorkin executes it. Feel free to add to the list.Sorkin does something that has never really been done before in the biopic genre- presenting a uniquely creative way of giving viewers a portrayal of a man that may be somewhat fictional and augmented in a finely-tuned three-part structure. I’ve never used this, so I’d be interested in anyone who might give an opinion on this or any of the other software I’ve mentioned. □Īnd for a piece of software that pertains directly to the job of writing songs, there’s MasterWriter, the “ultimate collection of writing tools for the professional songwriter.” It includes a 100,000-entry rhyming dictionary, a database to keep your songs and lyrics organized, a stereo hard disk recorder, tempo-adjustable drum loops, and more. ProTools is another recording software option that describes itself as “the world’s favorite audio platform”, so let the opinion-wars begin. Finale does that for me.įor sequencing/multi-track audio recording, Cakewalk Sonar is considered to be top of the line in the home studio market, along with Cubase. It’s important for me to get a score that looks professional. But that being said, here’s a brief description of popular programs, most if not all of which are available for Mac or PC.Īs sound recording is not as important to me these days as score writing, the software I use the most is Finale, which, along with its score-writing capabilities also has a somewhat limited sequencer. It’s best to do your research, read online forums, and gather as many opinions as you can before buying. It’s tricky to recommend one over the other, because by the time you’ve been using one piece of software for years, other programs become irrelevant to you. Occasionally I’m asked about software for songwriters.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |